Atlantic Richfield Company, et al. v. County of Santa Clara, California, et al.

Case Details

Status: Defeat
Docket No: 10-546
NCLC Involvement: Petitioner
Solicitor General Involvement: None
Sub-Issue: Contingency Fees
Industry: Consumer Goods
Sub-Industry:
Oral Argument Date:
Vote:

Question(s) Presented

Cert. was not granted in this case.

NCLC's Position

NCLC urged the Supreme Court to review a California decision that allowed the County of Santa Clara to outsource the state’s public nuisance claim against lead manufacturers to private attorneys on a contingent fee basis. NCLC argued in its brief that state and local governments are abusing contingent fee agreements to meet budget requirements, and that the agreements raise serious constitutional questions. NCLC warned that contingent fee litigation places perverse incentives on the just enforcement of law, as evidenced by recent high profile "pay-to-sue" corruption scandals.

Case Outcome

The Supreme Court declined to review this case.

Procedural History

Amicus brief supporting cert. filed 11/26/10. Cert. denied 1/10/11.

Case Documents