Engle, et al. v. Liggett Group Incorporated, et al.

Bifurcation of Class Actions

NCLC's Position

NCLC filed twice in this case: once on the merits and once to support rehearing.

This case was originally filed in 1994 and was certified as a class of Florida-only residents. It resulted in a punitive damages verdict of $145 billion in July 2000. A three-judge panel of Florida's Third District Court of Appeal set aside the verdict because, among other reasons, the class failed to meet virtually every legal requirement for class certification. On appeal to the Florida Supreme Court, NCLC argued in its first filing that personal injury cases are not suited for classwide adjudication because they necessarily involve individual factual inquiries, are substantial enough to be brought individually, and force defendants into exorbitant settlements. For similar reasons, NCLC argued that fraud cases are not suited for class treatment, and finally, that class certification is inappropriate where the court must apply numerous states' laws.

In August 2006, NCLC filed a second brief supporting rehearing after the Florida Supreme Court permitted some of the jury’s findings to stand while decertifying the class action as to causation and damages issues. In its brief, NCLC argued that such bifurcation violates the Florida rules governing class actions and the U.S. Constitution’s Due Process Clause.

Case Outcome

The Florida Supreme Court denied rehearing of the class action.

Procedural History

Amicus brief filed 7/23/04. Oral argument held 11/3/04. Decided 7/6/06. Amicus brief supporting rehearing filed 8/14/06. Rehearing denied 12/21/06.

Case Documents