Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid

U.S. Supreme Court

Question(s) Presented

Whether the uncompensated appropriation of an easement that is limited in time effects a per se physical taking under the Fifth Amendment.

Tab Group

Merits Stage

U.S. Supreme Court holds that government appropriation of an easement on employer property constitutes a per se physical taking under the Fifth Amendment

June 23, 2021

Click here to view the opinion.

U.S. Chamber files amicus brief in U.S. Supreme Court, arguing that government appropriation of an easement on employer property constitutes a per se physical taking under the Fifth Amendment

January 7, 2021

Click here to view the Chamber’s amicus brief. Steffen N. Johnson and the U.S. Chamber’s Litigation Center served as co-counsel for the U.S. Chamber.

Case Documents

Ninth Circuit Opinion - Cedar Point Nursery v. Shiroma (Ninth Circuit).pdf

Ninth Circuit Order Denying Rehearing -- Cedar Point Nursery v. Shiroma (Ninth Circuit).pdf

Cert. Petition -- Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid (U.S. Supreme Court).pdf

U.S. Chamber Amicus Brief -- Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid (U.S. Supreme Court).pdf

Petitioners' Brief on the Merits -- Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid (U.S. Supreme Court).pdf

Brief for the Solicitor General -- Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid (U.S. Supreme Court).pdf

Brief for Respondents -- Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid (U.S. Supreme Court).pdf

Opinion -- Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid (U.S. Supreme Court).pdf