New Jersey Civil Justice Institute and U.S. Chamber v. Grewal

U.S. District Court - District of New Jersey

Tab Group

Merits Stage

U.S. Chamber and New Jersey Civil Justice Institute files motion for summary judgment in litigation challenging New Jersey’s A.B. 121 law as preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act

January 7, 2020

The motion argues that, as applied to arbitration agreements covered by the Federal Arbitration Act, A.B. 121 is preempted. The plaintiffs seek a declaration and a permanent injunction against the Attorney General’s enforcement of the law.

U.S. Chamber and New Jersey Civil Justice Institute file complaint in federal court challenging New Jersey’s A.B. 121, which effectively bans the use of bilateral arbitration in employment agreements for employers in New Jersey

August 30, 2019

The complaint alleges that New Jersey’s law, as applied to arbitration, is preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act, and seeks declaratory and injunctive relief against the Attorney General of New Jersey from enforcing the law against employers with arbitration agreements.

Shalom D. Stone of Stone Conroy LLC, along with Andrew J. Pincus and Archis A. Parasharami of Mayer Brown LLP, served as co-counsel for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce on behalf of the U.S. Chamber Litigation Center.

Case Documents

Complaint -- New Jersey Civil Justice Institute v. Grewal (U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey).pdf

Motion for Summary Judgement -- New Jersey Civil Justice Institute and U.S. Chamber v. Grewal (U.S. District Court - District of New Jersey.pdf