Forum

U.S. Supreme Court

Case Status

Decided

Docket Number

07-906

Term

Cert. Denied

Share

Questions Presented

Whether a cost-of-living adjustment that a defined benefit pension plan has the discretion to provide to participants who elect to receive their benefits as a monthly annuity payment and that is explicitly excluded from the plan’s definition of “accrued benefit” nevertheless constitutes part of every participant’s “accrued benefit” under ERISA, 29 U.S.C. § 1002(23)(A), and therefore must also be provided to participants who select a one-time lump-sum distribution of their benefits.

Case Updates

Cert. petition denied

March 17, 2008

U.S. Chamber urges Supreme Court to review cost of living adjustments in defined benefit plans under ERISA

February 08, 2008

NCLC urged the Supreme Court to review a Seventh Circuit decision holding that a cost-of-living adjustment (“COLA”) that a defined benefit plan has discretion to provide to participants who elect to receive monthly annuities constitutes a per se accrued benefit under ERISA, and therefore must also be provided to participants who choose to receive their benefits in a one-time lump-sum distribution. In its brief, NCLC argued that the Seventh Circuit’s decision undermines sound retirement policy by encouraging lump-sum distributions over annuity payments, and increases the risk that employers will choose not to offer COLA’s because of the new and unanticipated financial obligations on plan sponsors.

Case Documents

Search