U.S. Supreme Court Amicus

Results are sorted by the date of most recent activity.

Filter Results

AbbVie Inc. v. FTC

U.S. Supreme Court
Decided
June 21, 2021

Supreme Court denies certiorari, declining to clarify application of Noer-Pennington immunity.  The U.S. Chamber filed amicus brief supporting the cert. petition and before the Third Circuit.  

Nestlé USA, Inc. v. Doe I; Cargill, Inc. v. Doe I

U.S. Supreme Court
Decided
June 17, 2021

U.S. Supreme Court holds that the Alien Tort Statute does not apply when all of the relevant conduct, apart from general corporate oversight, occurred abroad.   The U.S. Chamber filed seven amicus briefs supporting this outcome over the life of the case.

Nestlé USA, Inc. v. Doe I; Cargill, Inc. v. Doe I

U.S. Supreme Court
Decided
June 17, 2021

U.S. Supreme Court holds that the Alien Tort Statute does not apply when all of the relevant conduct, apart from general corporate oversight, occurred abroad.   The U.S. Chamber filed seven amicus briefs supporting this outcome over the life of the case.

Nestlé USA, Inc. v. Doe I; Cargill, Inc. v. Doe I

U.S. Supreme Court
Decided
June 17, 2021

U.S. Supreme Court holds that the Alien Tort Statute does not apply when all of the relevant conduct, apart from general corporate oversight, occurred abroad.   The U.S. Chamber filed seven amicus briefs supporting this outcome over the life of the case.

Nestlé USA, Inc. v. Doe I; Cargill, Inc. v. Doe I

U.S. Supreme Court
Decided
June 17, 2021

U.S. Supreme Court holds that the Alien Tort Statute does not apply when all of the relevant conduct, apart from general corporate oversight, occurred abroad.   The U.S. Chamber filed seven amicus briefs supporting this outcome over the life of the case.

Chevron Corp. v. City of Oakland

U.S. Supreme Court
Decided
June 14, 2021

U.S. Supreme Court denies certiorari in case involving question whether putative state-law tort claims alleging harm from global climate change are removable to federal court because they arise under federal law.  The U.S. Chamber filed an amicus brief in support of certiorari.

Chevron Corp. v. City of Oakland

U.S. Supreme Court
Decided
June 14, 2021

U.S. Supreme Court denies certiorari in case involving question whether putative state-law tort claims alleging harm from global climate change are removable to federal court because they arise under federal law.  The U.S. Chamber filed an amicus brief in support of certiorari.

Just Energy Marketing Corp. v. Hurt

U.S. Supreme Court
Decided
June 7, 2021

U.S. Supreme Court denies certiorari in case involving application of the Fair Labor Standards Act’s “outside salesman” exemption.  The U.S. Chamber filed a coalition amicus brief in support of certiorari.

Just Energy Marketing Corp. v. Hurt

U.S. Supreme Court
Decided
June 7, 2021

U.S. Supreme Court denies certiorari in case involving application of the Fair Labor Standards Act’s “outside salesman” exemption.  The U.S. Chamber filed a coalition amicus brief in support of certiorari.

Johnson & Johnson v. Ingham

U.S. Supreme Court
Decided
June 1, 2021

U.S. Supreme Court denies certiorari in case involving the issue of mass joinder, which raises serious due process concerns for defendants.  The U.S. Chamber filed a coalition amicus brief in support of certiorari, as well as three amicus briefs when this case was in the Missouri state courts.

Johnson & Johnson v. Ingham

U.S. Supreme Court
Decided
June 1, 2021

U.S. Supreme Court denies certiorari in case involving the issue of mass joinder, which raises serious due process concerns for defendants.  The U.S. Chamber filed a coalition amicus brief in support of certiorari, as well as three amicus briefs when this case was in the Missouri state courts.

Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. A.Y.

U.S. Supreme Court
Decided
May 17, 2021

Supreme Court denies certiorari in FDA preemption case.  The U.S. Chamber filed a coalition amicus brief in support of certiorari, arguing that federal law preempts state-law claims alleging that a drug manufacturer failed to warn of risks associated with off-label uses. 

Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. A.Y.

U.S. Supreme Court
Decided
May 17, 2021

Supreme Court denies certiorari in FDA preemption case.  The U.S. Chamber filed a coalition amicus brief in support of certiorari, arguing that federal law preempts state-law claims alleging that a drug manufacturer failed to warn of risks associated with off-label uses. 

CIC Services, LLC v. IRS

U.S. Supreme Court
Decided
May 17, 2021

Supreme Court holds that a pre-enforcement challenge to certain IRS reporting requirements is not barred by the Anti-Injunction Act, even though violation of those requirements may result in a tax penalty.  The U.S. Chamber filed amicus briefs supporting this outcome at the cert. and merits stages.

CIC Services, LLC v. IRS

U.S. Supreme Court
Decided
May 17, 2021

Supreme Court holds that a pre-enforcement challenge to certain IRS reporting requirements is not barred by the Anti-Injunction Act, even though violation of those requirements may result in a tax penalty.  The U.S. Chamber filed amicus briefs supporting this outcome at the cert. and merits stages.

CIC Services, LLC v. IRS

U.S. Supreme Court
Decided
May 17, 2021

Supreme Court holds that a pre-enforcement challenge to certain IRS reporting requirements is not barred by the Anti-Injunction Act, even though violation of those requirements may result in a tax penalty.  The U.S. Chamber filed amicus briefs supporting this outcome at the cert. and merits stages.

CIC Services, LLC v. IRS

U.S. Supreme Court
Decided
May 17, 2021

Supreme Court holds that a pre-enforcement challenge to certain IRS reporting requirements is not barred by the Anti-Injunction Act, even though violation of those requirements may result in a tax penalty.  The U.S. Chamber filed amicus briefs supporting this outcome at the cert. and merits stages.

B.P. p.l.c. v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore

U.S. Supreme Court
Decided
May 17, 2021

Supreme Court holds that where a lower court rejects removal of an action to federal court under the federal officer removal doctrine, an appellate court can review all grounds for removal asserted by the defendant, not only the federal-officer ground. The U.S. Chamber filed amicus briefs supporting this outcome at the cert. and merits stages, and also participated when the case was before the Fourth Circuit.

B.P. p.l.c. v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore

U.S. Supreme Court
Decided
May 17, 2021

Supreme Court holds that where a lower court rejects removal of an action to federal court under the federal officer removal doctrine, an appellate court can review all grounds for removal asserted by the defendant, not only the federal-officer ground. The U.S. Chamber filed amicus briefs supporting this outcome at the cert. and merits stages, and also participated when the case was before the Fourth Circuit.

B.P. p.l.c. v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore

U.S. Supreme Court
Decided
May 17, 2021

Supreme Court holds that where a lower court rejects removal of an action to federal court under the federal officer removal doctrine, an appellate court can review all grounds for removal asserted by the defendant, not only the federal-officer ground. The U.S. Chamber filed amicus briefs supporting this outcome at the cert. and merits stages, and also participated when the case was before the Fourth Circuit.

Pages