California Court of Appeal declines to resolve whether the Federal Arbitration Act preempts California's SB 707. The U.S. Chamber filed two amicus briefs urging the court to hold SB 707 preempted.
California Court of Appeal declines to resolve whether the Federal Arbitration Act preempts California's SB 707. The U.S. Chamber filed two amicus briefs urging the court to hold SB 707 preempted.
California Court of Appeal declines to resolve whether the Federal Arbitration Act preempts California's SB 707. The U.S. Chamber filed two amicus briefs urging the court to hold SB 707 preempted.
Ohio Trial Court upholds Governor’s suspension of temporary supplemental unemployment benefits. The U.S. Chamber filed an amicus brief supporting this outcome and explaining that while the benefits were important earlier in the pandemic, they are now hindering economic recovery by suppressing the labor market.
Ohio Trial Court upholds Governor’s suspension of temporary supplemental unemployment benefits. The U.S. Chamber filed an amicus brief supporting this outcome and explaining that while the benefits were important earlier in the pandemic, they are now hindering economic recovery by suppressing the labor market.
Supreme Court of Arizona dismisses petition for review as moot following plaintiffs’ notice of dismissals without prejudice in underlying action. The U.S. Chamber had filed a coalition amicus brief supporting the petition for review before plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed the action.
Supreme Court of Arizona dismisses petition for review as moot following plaintiffs’ notice of dismissals without prejudice in underlying action. The U.S. Chamber had filed a coalition amicus brief supporting the petition for review before plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed the action.
Missouri Supreme Court holds that the state’s cap on medical malpractice damages was a lawful exercise of the Missouri legislature’s authority. The U.S. Chamber filed a coalition amicus brief in support of this result.
Ohio Supreme Court concludes that the federal Clean Air Act neither expressly nor impliedly preempts claims under state law for manufacturers’ post-sale tampering with vehicles’ emissions-control systems. The U.S. Chamber filed two coalition amicus briefs opposing this outcome.
Missouri Supreme Court holds that the state’s cap on medical malpractice damages was a lawful exercise of the Missouri legislature’s authority. The U.S. Chamber filed a coalition amicus brief in support of this result.
Ohio Supreme Court concludes that the federal Clean Air Act neither expressly nor impliedly preempts claims under state law for manufacturers’ post-sale tampering with vehicles’ emissions-control systems. The U.S. Chamber filed two coalition amicus briefs opposing this outcome.
Ohio Supreme Court concludes that the federal Clean Air Act neither expressly nor impliedly preempts claims under state law for manufacturers’ post-sale tampering with vehicles’ emissions-control systems. The U.S. Chamber filed two coalition amicus briefs opposing this outcome.
Ohio Supreme Court concludes that the federal Clean Air Act neither expressly nor impliedly preempts claims under state law for manufacturers’ post-sale tampering with vehicles’ emissions-control systems. The U.S. Chamber filed two coalition amicus briefs opposing this outcome.
Pennsylvania Supreme Court reverses Superior Court and rejects expansive theory for piercing the corporate veil between sister companies. The U.S. Chamber filed a coalition amicus brief supporting this outcome.
Pennsylvania Supreme Court reverses Superior Court and rejects expansive theory for piercing the corporate veil between sister companies. The U.S. Chamber filed a coalition amicus brief supporting this outcome.
California Supreme Court holds “regular rate of compensation,” for purposes of calculating overtime pay, encompasses hourly wages and nondiscretionary payments. The U.S. Chamber filed an amicus brief opposing this outcome.
California Supreme Court holds “regular rate of compensation,” for purposes of calculating overtime pay, encompasses hourly wages and nondiscretionary payments. The U.S. Chamber filed an amicus brief opposing this outcome.
Louisiana Supreme Court affirms remand for new trial, holding that the trial court (not the jury) should have decided the amount of liability for remediation. The U.S. Chamber filed an amicus brief asking the Court to reinstate the jury verdict.
Louisiana Supreme Court affirms remand for new trial, holding that the trial court (not the jury) should have decided the amount of liability for remediation. The U.S. Chamber filed an amicus brief asking the Court to reinstate the jury verdict.
Louisiana Supreme Court affirms remand for new trial, holding that the trial court (not the jury) should have decided the amount of liability for remediation. The U.S. Chamber filed an amicus brief asking the Court to reinstate the jury verdict.
